top of page

SMART CITY

There is no single universally accepted definition for the concept of smart city and comments may vary by context (Nam & Pardo, 2011). Many of the authors have tried to formulate the definition of a “smart city” by connecting it with different terms, which is indicative of the lack of a widely accepted definition (Schaffers, et al., 2012) (Zhuhadar, et al., 2017). In publications dealing with the subject of a “smart city”, there are many different terms for this concept, such as “digital city” (Tan, 1999), “wired city” (Targowski, 1990), “ubiquitous city” (Shin, 2009),, “sensing city” (Mone, 2015). A metaphor is the “intelligent city” featuring advanced ICT, complexes wired for satellite and fiber optics (Harris, 1992).


The smart city concept assumes that a city should be a creative and sustainable place so that improves the quality of life, creates a friendlier environment and develops the economy (Lee, 2014). It also provides resources and ways to improve operational efficiency, competitiveness and quality of life (Stratigea, et al., 2015).

Image by Andrea Cau

SMART CITY INDICATORS

There are different number of sub-criteria set under the each indicator. The smart city dimensions is shown below.

Picture1.png
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2021, Smart City tarafından Wix.com ile kurulmuştur.

bottom of page